what it means to live
.
Vita. We are born and die. We come to this world and of him in a certain, nieznznym time for us - we go. The gift of life - you can say the highest value. Every being has a right to it. But are you sure? "Life does not belong to us - we are not the creators, though somehow the creators of that. So much is said about the right to freedom, a choice that everyone has the freedom to provoke, but is it a higher value is not the right to life? To something from us that the end does not care? Since so many are fighting for animal rights - to life, no suffering, etc., would it be refused the right to the most perfect of 'animal'? "But in the name of freedom, equality, despotism, tyranny and oppression - by all means try to impose right (obligation) to death!
But one after another. Zdehumanizowany man dehumanized increasingly fighting for the legalization of killing (no matter which stage of life, and in what circumstances), the annihilation of another life unpunished in the name of ... - In the name of what? Convenience? someone has to live problem-free? whims? whim? slipping it easy with the shock on the water waste poisoned the pool? As a general comment on today's cinema, art exhibitions of all kinds - you can get an impression of "animal behavior" of man. Yet perhaps it was not so much naturalism, brutalist and without any embarrassment, most served openly. Not only combining attempt on the life of older and infirm people - in the name of so-called. "Good death". Do przmusowy end may be a good thing? Does not the slightest chance is it not to undo life and what dignity? Subconsciously, healthy, normal person, unconsciously desires to live, by all means, do not want to reach the end. Processed will always be tugged and tried to get out to the surface - into the air to catch his breath. When it comes to the end of man (the natural) - it is turning (like every other living creature), in order to break even at the last minute szponom death - to life. Well a man can decide about the second? And what about yourself? How is it able to determine what will be felt, what he wanted and what is not being decided yet life-threatening situation? Can be written down to prejudge its loss - when his natural instinct is to fight for żcie? At the risk of man is capable of various heroic, unimaginable, and desperate acts. It is the destiny of man - live! For this he was called. I want to live, and I speak from a position of experience of similar situations. How, then, the second can starve him and numb the pain finally falling asleep, cutting hair last life?
Well, yes, it is easier to hasten the end. Why bother yourself and ... ? After all, life comprehends today as "easy, light and fun! The right to have only healthy, beautiful, young and rich!
Well, not too young ... Can not be cut off the end? It can start from scratch? Without beginning? Who actually found the beginning? Since we begin with a man? Since the fertilization of the ovum is not, since then the organs are already formed? No, since coming into the world? No, and what a man - does not speak, do not earn and how he looks! From reaching the age of majority? So maybe dozwolimy eliminating inconvenient 'units' to 18 years of age and after, I know 50s? Game over - fall out of the game! you are no longer usable! And you will not be useful, so why do you exist? (Sorry - why you continue to have existed?) The plan failed, is not it time we create a copy of the "perfect" - in such a shape and in that time that we will respond! Using the machinery, technology will create a small robot, and as we get bored - it will go "hunting season"! A little of this tube, a little bit from that and create a branch Frankensteinów.
brrrr! In what world we live in? Is it the ambiguity of the world, which completely mad? People-amenable prawieże works 24 hours a day producing new models of robots - chasing the latest trends in fashion and screams. Worn copies - for scrap. Why take up space? They are no longer useless! Computer games quickly bored, come up with a new mutation - let 's have in God! What we talked będize how is it done? Ourselves, we can have some fun!
And ethics? What a relic strożytnej culture! Now lives differently. The right to anything? Unfortunately, not everybody and this is not always principally the right to life. Choice? Is today I can decide whether you can live, so just because I wanted? And how do you decide about my life? Or maybe pohandlujemy - life for how much?
Does having longer so vast knowledge we have lost the sense and common sense? Have you completely in every field all must stand on his head? I wonder just when it all will fall (and fall will be great). Instead of Using the knowledge to develop more and more, to cultivate what is valuable - life, act in self-destruction is deceiving, beguiling guise that there just is life.
"It seems that not without reason shall be good in itself, and happiness in conjunction with different ways of life. And generally uneducated villagers see them delight, therefore, satisfied with life amounts to use. Are in fact three main types of life, namely, in addition to the above-mentioned, or a life devoted to civic activities, or theoretical contemplation " Original: www.racjonalista.pl / kk.php / s, 6395 (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, op. cit., 81-82)
"There are three agents, bringing the proceedings to ensure the happiness we've found that previously the highest good for human excellence, theoretical knowledge and pleasure, we see that there are three kinds of life that all people, according to the possible, choose to experience it: the life of politics, life philosophy and lives are committed to delight. Among them, the philosopher wants to say what concerns the theoretical knowledge and contemplation of truth, a politician wants beautiful acts (themselves the result of excellence), a man devoted to pleasure seeks carnal pleasures " Original: www.racjonalista.pl / kk.php / s, 6395 ( Aristotle , eudemejska Ethics, op.cit. , p. 406)
Is there anything FORCE mean? Is it worth anything?
jew
0 comments:
Post a Comment