Thursday, July 2, 2009

Michael Saliba In Dubai

world upside down - Theory of Internal Model of the Universe

expanses of the Internet encountered a strange theory about the structure of our universe, I decided to share its knowledge of our readers.

Earth and Sun in the background of stars orbiting in the interior

Theory of Internal Model of the Universe says Rolf Keppler of Germany - a descendant of the famous Johannes Kepler and the theory is based partly on his work and the work of the great authorities of the world of science.
In contrast to the Copernican model of the universe, there is ample evidence that we live within Earth's galaxy. The theory of the internal space does not exist recently, but it was widely known in ancient cultures.

internal model of the universe is itself one of the great harmony of all processes occurring in nature. Funniest of all is the fact that our world is constructed so that the laws of physics apply in both cases alike, which, unfortunately, makes a mathematical model of Copernicus the basis of all sciences to build a universe, because he was the "first". All deficiencies and inaccuracies in the heliocentric model are cleverly covered up supporting theories, and the rest are simply silent.

In the case of an internal universe, and everything turns to close the ball, where the proportions are respectively lower and the second pass to dymensji so unimaginable that these are measured in billions of light years.
long observed and confirmed by science that the more we move away from the Earth spacecraft velocity decreases, this science is unable to clearly explain this phenomenon. The speed of light in space so far no one could, or wanted to measure what matters a lot to finally explained. The biggest mistake
by science is the belief that the speed of electromagnetic wave in a vacuum, resulting from a physical constant is c = 299792458 m / s. Delving into the essence of relativity theory does not solve the issue, simply confuses the matter and move away from the main theme.
order not to be misunderstood I must add that today's science does not reject this possibility.
Any variation speed of light may have important cosmological significance, perhaps reflect on one or the other topology of the universe, about one or another direction for its development. It may also be crucial philosophical.

Our descendants will look at our school with pity, as we are doing it out of medieval science, and science of the Middle Ages did so with the ancient teachings. And people may soon discover that the earth is a sphere, yes, but we're in the middle! Other planets also are empty inside and it is conceivable that it is within their means, there is life, and even other civilizations. It is also explained by the fact, why so far not found any life forms on other planets. You just need to look for life in the middle of the planets, and not outside. It is interesting to cite
that studied by NASA, the moon is in the middle empty. It is possible that the Earth is also part of another galaxy and circling each other in the middle and the outer surface of it is barren and covered with huge craters, like all other planets, which until then "examined".
So probably it is all built of earth and its kernel is circulating in the middle of another planet, this planet again in the middle of another and so on to infinity.
This is what we perceive as the star, is the center (core galaxies) of our Earth system, which we take for starry sky. In total, we see through its center some light, or maybe even just the sunlight that pierces through it, or bounces.

Earth - the two hemispheres ...

such notables as Isaac Newton and Leonhard Euler Throughout her life, preferred the hollow earth theories. Measurements made over 100 years ago, fully confirm the theory, but science does not take note of these facts, and indeed does not allow such thoughts to himself. And appropriately enough to build a powerful telescope with infrared filters to be able to see the Polish example, London or Moscow, and it is standing on the ground, and not at the top of the highest tower or the mountains! But this fact would certainly be just another challenge for researchers at all costs to try to prove that this is another phenomenon caused by the reflection of the atmosphere, in order to defend their religion called science and its commandments.

is also an interesting phenomenon ... why the plane flew at an altitude of 7 km, where the amount of exposure should not exceed 296 km, tests using an infrared camera showed the visibility is 532.9 km, although this angle of vision is absolutely impossible that large swathes of land!
Angle from this height is almost twice that which we demonstrate math and logic says. This is one piece of evidence that we live in the middle of the globe, such as visibility is with that height, but only in the middle of the ball.

The very translation of the phenomenon of mirages should give many people a reason to reflect. Some observations indicate that, in Strasbourg, was seen in the port of Constantinople with such incredible precision in mapping the details if it were a mirror image of a neighbor's house.
How is it possible that from a distance of 1866 km to be able to see exactly after reportedly between observer and the port is a globe ...
observing ships at sea, careful observers will not get away whereas we nadpływające ships like the first chimneys emerged from the depths of what udowadniało to convexity of the Earth and the heliocentric model of the universe. Nothing else, as usual, an optical illusion, caused by the reflection and refraction of light in an elliptical direction of Earth's core.

In 1897, the U.S. Professor Morrow has built structures used to measure ocean ridges. The results were astounding: the length of just 3.8 km ocean was 1.22 m above the measuring! And so the ocean is concave like a bowl of ice cream ... The measurements were repeated many times, were taken into account the size of the tides.
has also been shown that light refracts elliptically upwards, which causes the illusion of a convex Earth. When the distance to the ship is big enough impression that he emerges from the sea and comes not from the top, because the elliptical course of the light the visibility of our vision is limited to view only the upper parts of the ship, where the bottom is out of sight.
This phenomenon can be calculated using the formula for the refraction of light, taking into account the concavity of the inner sphere at a given distance from the reference point. Do any of you ever wondered about it, that standing on the shore impression that tile sea situated well above the shoreline? If not, then I recommend paying special attention to this can be seen on land.

formula for the refraction of light, helping to prove this theory:

b1 = arc (half circle) = 5000 m
b2 = District = 10,000
r = radius of earth = 6371000 m
dh = height difference, which theodolite should indicate if the light beam would be absolutely straight.

X1 = (r / cos (b1 / r)) - r
X2 = (r / cos (b2 / r)) - r
dh = X2 - X1


Example:

X1 = (6,371,000 / cos (5000 / 637 1000)) - 6,371,000 = 1.962016 m
X2 = (6,371,000 / cos (10000/6371000)) - 6,371,000 = 7.848070 m
dh = 7.848070 - 1.962016 5.886054
dh = m

As you can see the light beam refracts elliptically up (!)
who still do not believe, may substitute a higher number for the b1 and b2, or borrow from friends surveying instrument with a mechanical level control and convincing of the rightness of the theory.

If all the evidence has not yet convinced ... I recommend a trip to Lake Constance and I have to bring a telephoto lens at least 400 mm, and do some photos of the opposite shore, between Friedrichshafen and Romanshorn.
For this purpose it is leveling the lens and take a few pictures, while in the middle of the lake runs the ferry. For the record, the distance between them in a straight line is about 11 km. According to the theory of Copernicus and straightforward course of rays of light picture so made should present a ferry on the lake, and on the other side we should see the tops of the trees and the higher floors of buildings. I assure you that it is not! Picture will always be so made, and each time make the ferry on the lake and in the middle of the shuttle, over side, we see the other side. The corresponding measurements of the shuttle showed differences of up to 2.34 m between the surface of a lake and a point seen in the pictures as a shore! To provide such images for certain institutions caused great astonishment of scientists and those scratching their heads ... In addition, quite

interesting calculation:

half the distance between Friedrichshafen and Romanshorn: b = 0.5 * 11 km = 5.5 km.
Earth's mean radius r = 6371 km
Searched height: h

h = (r - (r * cos (b / r))) * 1000
h = (6371 km - (6371 km * cos (5.5 km / 6371 km))) * 1000
h = 2.374 m!!

This sounds like a fairy tale but true, because this is the height of the arch and on the distance to our beloved Earth. It is proof of the concavity of the Earth, which scientists ignore, and those convinced of the validity of the theory remain silent for fear of ridicule before the entire range of academic and job loss. Who is behind all this, who has an interest in lying to mankind? After all, every layman could be as simple measurements and calculations performed to find out the truth and open the eyes of all skeptics. How long will this farce must go and why?

In 1901, miners in Tamarack Mine, "two engineers made the measurements of the distance between the mine shafts on the surface and underground at a depth of 1,295.4 meters, with a lowered risers for this depth. The distance between the shafts under the ground was 975.360 m, and on the surface 974.964 m. Given that the two did not know the theory of internal space, convinced of the falsity of their measurements, repeating them over and over, but under the guidance of Professor Mc. Nair'a who, as a proponent of the theory of Copernicus had with a heavy heart, and definitely consider these results for real!
Similar measurements were made in other mines, and bridges on the top of the world. These measurements have been performed already 100 years ago and are repeated to this day. Each time the result is the same, the earth is concave and not convex! And what about science? Well, now everyone knows. I still remember from school, We were pressed like this, that the distance between the panes of the earth are always smaller than those on the surface, because our planet is a sphere and we live on its surface. Measurements show but quite different.

Everyone has heard about the measurements will ship speed in knots by the so-called. log, which originally had a form of graduated links wound on the winch with a wooden shoe attached to its end. The measurement was effected through the stern or thrown overboard brick and timing of which developed into a link. Similarly, you can do
measured velocity of the Earth, but not with the object ejected overboard, but by expulsion "of the light behind her." Thought was that if the Earth revolves around the Sun, it speeds it can, using special instruments to measure. To this end, a Nobel laureate, Professor Allais performed a very accurate optical measuring instrument, which he had carefully noted the speed of the Earth Sun. The measured speed was 0 km per hour!
situation is similar to the Earth's rotation around its axis. Professor Barnet examined the metal bar fitted in a circular motion becomes a magnet, and so came to the conclusion that the Earth, which is packed with various particles of metal, turning on its axis at a speed of 1670 km / h, produced by such a huge magnetic field that, after a short time should be stopped. But this does not - does not make it, because on its own axis does not rotate, as well as does not rotate around the sun!

nucleus of the galaxy and the Earth's movement of the Sun relative to the earth.

Rights of gravity in the mathematical model, Copernicus, no one had can logically explain, but there are some silly snute suppose not supported by any meaningful scientific facts or evidence, they can not be the phenomenon according to logically explain the Copernican theory, but by. theory of internal galaxy for sure. Some argue that the earth attracts us, and others, it was some unknown force pushes us from space to Earth. Same suspect, no evidence! With increasing distance to the Sun does not decrease the force of gravity. Notice that the orbits further from the sun are planets of different sizes and the sun keeps them with me, and not on the principle of universal gravitation, but on the principle of segregation by potential, because for the larger they are reportedly back a small planet.

The internal layout of the galaxy major source of gravity is its kernel, not the sun. Center of the galaxy rotates around its axis, and the sun and the planets around the galactic center - among other things is why we have day and night. It is possible that it and the Earth on its axis turns, but with a speed close to the nucleus, but certainly not with such a crazy speed, which We study forward. Well, but scientists have yet in some way to explain to us the 24-hour day, as we know the Earth's circumference at the equator is about 40tys km and when it is divided by 24 hours receive a speed of about 1667 km / h. Let me explain so someone sensibly, which in this case happens to the centrifugal force? Vanishes, it is not simply because the physics invented so that it is balanced! What force would have to attract at the speed of hills. push us to the earth, so to offset the enormous power? About unimaginable overloads not to mention.
At present there are already pushing alternative theories of the gravitational forces of the cosmos, which for thousands of years are the foundation of the theory of the inner galaxy, for example, proclaimed by the Sumerians, and many other ancient civilizations. The fact that ancient civilizations had an amazing astronomical knowledge probably do not need anyone to remind and prove.

The Helmholtz energy or force can neither be produced, as well as can not be destroyed. Energy and strength can only be converted from one form to another. Yes you can for example, the potential energy converted into kinetic energy or thermal energy, which is much more complicated as it sounds. In other words, the power to know that the body subjected to this force begins to change its velocity (because the acceleration is a measure of the speed change). The greater the force is applied, the faster the speed of change. For example, a large force in a short time a heavy object accelerates to high speeds. A large force can stop it sooner great speeding object.
The Copernicus model of the universe immediately raises a certain lack of precision, and that is force called gravity. Because as we know, the phenomenon of gravity is the glue of the universe - is a primary force acting between large bodies - in particular celestial bodies. It is a universal force, present in any corner of the cosmos. The value of the gravitational attractive force acting between two bodies is directly proportional to the product of masses of interacting bodies and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their means. Only that this force must constantly carry out a job, and without any external influence, which interferes at each point of the rule of Helmholtz. Isaac Newton already knew this inconsistency, which he could not explain. Expressed itself in such a way that it was a breath of the divine, who has thrown all the planets in motion. The schools do not say it explicitly, just that this force is simply, is always constant, does not change and that no one knows where she assumes, of inventing Graviton not to mention - and this is just a big discrepancy .

issue size of the cosmos and intergalactic distances `'counted in billions of light years: With the amount of (The distance from the Earth's surface), decreasing the distance, and probably all the external dimensions of all bodies, so that approaching the center of our "universe" spacecraft, which will recommend getting smaller and the distance that will be overcome in time unit flying the same speed, as well. It resembles quite a peculiar version of the Theory of Relativity, which as we know it is not possible to reach the speed of light, because as it approaches the speed of the decline all the dimensions of a moving the body and its distance to other bodies, so it was not able to reach the speed of light. In addition, change is the passage of time for this body. From a mathematical point of view, it's probably a sequence converges to the limit (in particular, to zero), where a meter on Earth's surface remains a subway, but the same real one meter near the center of the earth we have, we can observe as a billion light years. What is meant by that, but closer to the galaxy velocity decreases accordingly, and at the same nucleus is equal to zero - which is due to the enormous repulsion gravitational kernel. For this reason, getting to the galaxy becomes absolutely impossible! However, the surface of the Earth is almost stationary relative the Earth's core, where the crust does not have its own gravitational force - but more on that later. The whole mystery of the cosmos internal model is based on the notion of transformation space. All points outside the Earth przenośmy to the center, where all amounts are decreasing, and in the center of the Earth form its nucleus. The same principle is the transformation of all possible laws of physics to the interior of Earth's galaxy. And so the universe is unreal and unimaginable the distance and spaces, created with the help of mathematics and astronomy, are transformed into the real world inside the galaxy, just by adding a tiny, innocent minusika the result of a mathematical expression, which inadvertently or rashness not erected several hundred years ago.

issue inability to see the other side of the Earth, the Earth's sphericity concave, sunsets, day and night: Everything is explained in this theory, the postulate of a parabolic zakrzywianiu of light is always toward the center of the Earth (top). This means that the sun circling at a distance from the surface of the Earth around the center of the Earth, it should always be visible (albeit from different angles), and should never be night. But this is not, because although in the south, where it is directly over our head, everything is normal, it's morning and evening sun can be seen much lower than it should be, to the ground, so that light from it does not fly to us straight line, just turn up. This means that if the light that came out of the sun exactly in our direction, it is no longer able to reach us, because Turned into space above us. However, this light, which reaches us, the sun came out toward the area of \u200b\u200bland much further from us, and closer to the Sun, but Turned off the ground so that it reaches us horizontally, so we just see the sun at horizon. This horizontal light also turns running further into space and then stop to see the sun now, because it's the light that trafiało horizontally to us was probably already past for obvious reasons, we could see.
seasons arise because the sun and planets do not move along a fixed orbit, but the orbits spiral upwards and down. It is also possible that it is not the sun but the earth's axis relative galactic nucleus changes its position.

Even more striking is that so. refraction, reflection, absorption and polarization of radio waves in the ionosphere, which as we know, ordinary radio waves quite effectively stops. However, if such a wave would be penetrated by it somehow, it should dissipate somewhere in outer space, but it is not! If, however, has somehow passed by the ionosphere, bounced from something in a vacuum, it is on its way back should bounce back from it and go back out into space and not on Earth. The radio waves back to earth is always in various time intervals (average of 8 / 10 sec) as a so-called. Echo radio. The fact of their existence proved repeatedly Stoemer professor already in 1927, and informed the scientific world, which, after suitable experiments, the fact is 100% confirmed. Even suspected that in our solar system from 12.5 thousand year orbit two huge artificial satellites, which were the remains of extinct civilizations of the developed land, and it took them to the waves bounce back ...

Some unknown facts is worth to know: Who watched closely
expedition space probes to Mars, that is certainly good to remember that Mars is surrounded by many, but not made absolutely no measurements of its size, which would eventually able to explain many inaccuracies. Why fat seems to be billions, but you would not think of performance on the occasion of accurate measurements of Mars? At the appropriate inquiries sent to NASA, the response was that the size of Mars are already widely known and there is no such need. After all, it is irresponsible and unforgivable mistake! Photos of Mars performed
by NASA showed a lot of inconsistencies in terms of proportions of Mars to the Sun.
In addition, studies of the Moon revealed that the mountains on the moon, which supposedly had to have a height of 2000 m, in fact, are small kopami lunar dust and meteorites! Similarly, the craters on the moon, the proportions are absolutely not agree - nothing and nothing! So why NASA does not do at the end of accurate measurements of the Moon and Mars?
with 24-hour satellite movie made in the 60's by NASA showed that the movement of planets like it was the opposite of that which We pick up from the earth and the sun was moving at an odd orbit. This movie was a few years ago was broadcast on German television. None of the researchers could not clearly explain the reasons for these phenomena. During the total lunar eclipse the earth, NASA satellite made shots, which show it was very clear that the moon is brightly lit! How? After all, Sun is the Earth completely clobbered! So where is the light, UFO illuminated the Moon?

I realize that after what I have said and will say next - today science luminaries hailed me nieukiem, dilettante or even a charlatan. But despite this I will continue in his belief, based on years of observations of the great scientists, analyzing their work and their own intuition, and that modern science deliberately falsify reality so effectively, that even I with all this nonsense for many years I believed! Fortunately, there is a sufficiently large group of professors and astrophysicists, and many other highly educated and enlightened people who seek the truth constantly and one day it will reveal.

I know just falls apart on me thunderbolts from heaven, so please criticizing and commenting on the use of property, constructive arguments, and objective look at this theory, not a meaningless insult me \u200b\u200bjust because I preach a theory incompatible with the one you gave teachers in schools. Adopt a position that it must be so, and end, they all say so, and whoever thinks otherwise ago in the head and general laughter in the courtroom, there is only a proof of conformity, and inability to samomyślenia. I am not forcing anyone to believe in this theory, which can not be said of modern science, and try to pass my experiences are different purely informative. I note that the material collected by me and the information contained therein should not be used as the official doctrine, as well as a generally accepted model of the universe, but give the reader the possibility of a different look at us as a child instilled some "truth."
Many will say: but it's fantasy. For now, I wrote only the facts ... fantasy, in the face of what else we discover, can we all fail. To understand the theory that you want to reject a number of schemes imposed on us for centuries. There are a lot of things unexplained, but we must not forget that the world is pushed to the front of those who do not rode in the diagrams, and entering a bold thesis Newton, Einstein, who for his nonsense often were perceived as charlatans, fools and dreamers.

Rolf Kepler

Finally I would like to thank everyone who came to this place in the text and also to announce that all known models of the universe today are temporary unspecified and the purely subjective and the definitions they are so uncertain, as every science created by how imperfect human minds. Therefore, these research models must be seen not as a reality in itself, but as models that may have perceived it to be helpful.

more about the theory of the universe to the inner side of Rolf Kepler and pages:

http://www.innenweltkosmos.de
http://www.weltbildfrage.de
http:/ / www.langw.de

0 comments:

Post a Comment